Tren Desain Kurikulum Adaptif di Era Disrupsi Sebagai Strategi Manajerial Menuju Pendidikan Masa Depan

Ma’shum Thoyib

doi:10.61132/jmpai.v3i4.1162

Authors

Ma’shum Thoyib Universitas KH. Mukhtar Syafaat Blokagung Banyuwangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jmpai.v3i4.1162

Keywords:

Adaptive curriculum, Disruption, Flexibility, Leadership, Technology

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how adaptive curriculum encourages learning flexibility and its contribution to improving the quality of education in the era of disruption. The research approach used is qualitative with a case study type. This research was conducted at MI Al Khoiriyyah, Muara Bungo, Indonesia. Data collection techniques include in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. Data analysis was carried out through data reduction techniques, data presentation, and drawing conclusions, while the validity of the data was checked by triangulation of sources and techniques. The results of the study indicate that adaptive curriculum provides flexible space for teachers to adjust learning methods and materials according to student characteristics, supported by the visionary managerial leadership of the principal and the use of digital technology. These findings show that the success of adaptive curriculum is greatly influenced by the synergy between educational actors and supporting facilities that are responsive to change. The contribution of this study lies in a comprehensive understanding of the practice of implementing adaptive curriculum and strategic recommendations for the development of future education policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeniyi, I. S., Al Hamad, N. M., Adewusi, O. E., Unachukwu, C. C., Osawaru, B., Onyebuchi, C. N., & David, I. O. (2024). Educational reforms and their impact on student performance: A review in African countries. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr

Adi Badiozaman, I. F., Leong, H. J., & Wong, W. (2022). Embracing educational disruption: A case study in making the shift to a remote learning environment. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2020-0397

Ahun, M. N., Aboud, F., Wamboldt, C., & Yousafzai, A. K. (2023). Implementation of UNICEF and WHO’s care for child development package: Lessons from a global review and key informant interviews. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1140843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1140843

Alek, R., Fitria, H., & Eddy, S. (2021). The role of teachers in implementing curriculum 13 in primary schools. JPGI (Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia), 6(1), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpgi.v6i1.34461

Arifudin, O. (2025). Why digital learning is the key to the future of education. International Journal of Education and Digital Learning (IJEDL), 3(4), 201–210.

Catacutan, A., Kilag, O. K., Diano Jr, F., Tiongzon, B., Malbas, M., & Abendan, C. F. (2023). Competence-based curriculum development in a globalized education landscape. Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(4), 270–282.

El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00288-5

Franco, E., González-Peño, A., Trucharte, P., & Martínez-Majolero, V. (2023). Challenge-based learning approach to teach sports: Exploring perceptions of teaching styles and motivational experiences among student teachers. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 32, 100432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2023.100432

Gao, M., Liu, J., & Wu, L. (2022). The development dilemma and breakthrough of Chinese rural teachers from the perspective of rural revitalization. In 2022 International Conference on Science Education and Art Appreciation (SEAA 2022) (pp. 501–514). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220407.091

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.04.003

Hardianti, H., Risnawati, R., & Ananta, N. (2024). Enhancing personalized learning and engagement through technology in modern education. Educia Journal, 2(1), 46–55.

Lahiya, A., Arifudin, O., & Matiala, T. F. (2025). Education administration reform: A case study on the implementation of the Merdeka curriculum. INJOSEDU: International Journal of Social and Education, 2(2), 29–37.

Mahmood, A., Huang, X., & Rehman, N. (2025). The role of teachers and administrators in supporting the adaptation of students with special needs in mainstream high schools. Quality Education for All, 2(1), 35–54.

Malik, A., Khatoon, M., Siddique, S., & Rauf, A. (2024). Disruptive technologies in education: Transforming traditional curriculum models for the 21st century. Multidisciplinary Journal of Emerging Needs of Curriculum, 1(2), 53–60.

Manca, S., & Delfino, M. (2021). Adapting educational practices in emergency remote education: Continuity and change from a student perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1394–1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13114

Maphosa, V. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on remote-based teaching and learning in the COVID-19 era: Rethinking technology availability and suitability in Zimbabwe. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(1), e02105. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/10800

Mukrim, M., Einsenring, M. A. A., Hastini, H., & Hasyim, Z. (2023). Exploring impacts of teacher professional education (PPG) on teacher practice: A case of two eastern Indonesian rural school teachers. Jurnal As-Salam, 7(2), 264–275.

Ngoasong, M. Z. (2022). Curriculum adaptation for blended learning in resource-scarce contexts. Journal of Management Education, 46(4), 622–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629211011129

Niemi, K. (2021). ‘The best guess for the future?’ Teachers’ adaptation to open and flexible learning environments in Finland. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1841016

Papadatou-Pastou, M., Touloumakos, A. K., Koutouveli, C., & Barrable, A. (2021). The learning styles neuromyth: When the same term means different things to different teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36, 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00468-5

Rofiq, N. (2025). Curriculum development model as solution for adaptive education in the era of disruption. GAJIE: Global Journal of Islamic Education, 1(1), 63–74.

Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025). AI‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 1921–1947. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2592

Taylor, D. L., Yeung, M., & Bashet, A. Z. (2021). Personalized and adaptive learning. In Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward (pp. 17–34). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7010-4.ch002

Tuma, F. (2021). The use of educational technology for interactive teaching in lectures. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 62, 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.051

Winoto, S. (2022). Improving curriculum and lecturers: Challenges to quality based-technology. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 13(2), 221–242.