Logika, Penalaran, Dan  Argumentasi  Hukum

Wiranto Wiranto; Mozes lawolata

doi:10.61132/jbpakk.v2i2.322

Authors

Wiranto Wiranto Sekolah Tinggi Theologi Injili Arastamar (SETIA) Jakarta
Mozes lawolata Sekolah Tinggi Theologi Injili Arastamar (SETIA) Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jbpakk.v2i2.322

Keywords:

Logic, Reasoning, Induction, Deduction, Legal Reasoning And Argumentation

Abstract

Nowdays, the understanding and knowledge in logic, reasoning, and legal argumentation become moreabsolute necessity not only for civitas academica in philosophy and law but most important for legal practitioners as polices, judges, prosecutors, attorneys, lawyers, and even all members of society whosedealing with legal problems everyday. As apart of generally reasoning, legal reasoning, although have some different characteristics, is attached to valid principles of reasoning such as rules of reasoning, rules of sillogism, rules of inductive probability, and informal fallacies. Thus legal reasoning is not a distinct and separate kind of reasoning from logic as science of how to think rightly, appropriately, and valid (as a branch of philosophy) but rather how to applied rules of reasoning from logic principles to legal problems. This article explores the rules of thinking in induction and sillogism. IRAC (Issue, Rule, Argument, dan Conclusion) model as an application of inductive and sillogistic reasoning in law will to end this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashley, K. D., 1990, Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals,Cambrifge – MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.

Bench-Capon, T. J. M. & Coenen, F. P., 1992, “Isomorphism and Legal Knowledge Based Systems” dalam Artificial Intelligence and Law 1: 65-86

Berman, D. H. & Hafner, C. D., 1987, “Indeterminacy: A Challenge to Logic-based Models of Legal Reasoning” dalam Yearbook of Law Computers and Technology Vol. 3:1-35, London: Butterworths.

Copi, Irving M., & Cohen Carl, 1997, Introduction to Logic, 10th ed., Richmond Tx.: Prentice Hall.

Douglas, Lind, 2007, Logic and Legal Reasoning, 2nd. San Diego, California: The National Judicial College Pres.

Dworkin, Ronald, 1977, Taking Rights Seriously, London: Duckworth.

Dworkin, Ronald, 1986, Law’s Empire, Cambridge – Mass: Belknap Press.

Dworkin, Ronald, 2011, Justice for Hedgehogs, Cambridge Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Frank, J., 1930, Law and the Modern Mind, New York: Brentano’s

Fuller, L., 1958, “Positivism and Fidelity to Law - A Reply to Professor Hart”, 71 Harv. L. Rev. 630

Grossi, Davide & Rotolo, Antonino, 2012, “Logic in the Law: A Concise Overview” dalamLogic in the Law, 1-19.

Hage, Jaap, 2005, Studies in Legal Logic, Netherland: Springer.

Halper, Thomas, 1968, “Logic in Judicial Reasoning”, dalam Indiana Law Journal, vol. 44, Iss. 1, artikel 2, 33-48.

Hamersma, Harry, 2008, Pintu Masuk ke Dunia Filsafat, Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Hanson, Sharon, 2010, Legal Method, Skills, and Reasoning, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge-Cavendish.

Hart, H. L. A., 1982, Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory, Oxford: Clarendon.

Hohfeld, W. N., 1913, “Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning”, 23 Yale Law J. 16

Holland, J.A., & Webb, J.S., 2013, Learning Legal Rules: A Students’ Guide to Legal Method and Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hurley, Patric J., 1997, A Concise Introduction to Logic, Belmon, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Kelsen, Hans, 1973, Essays in Legal and Moral Philosophy, diterjemahkan ke dalam bahasa Indonesia dengan judul Hukum dan Logika oleh B. Arief Sidharta, Bandung (2002): Alumni.

Loui, R. P., Norman, J., 1995, “Rationales and Argument Moves” dalam Artificial Intelligence and Law 3(3): 159-185.

Malec, Andrzej, 2001, “Legal Reasoning and Logic”, dalam Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 97-101.4, (17).

McLeod, T. I., 2011, Legal Method, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mundiri, H., 2012, cet. Ke-15, Logika, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Patterson, Edwin W., 1942, “Logic in the Law”, dalamUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 90, No. 8, 875-909.

Prakken, H., 1993, “A logical framework for modelling legal argument”, dalam Proc. 4 th Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1-9. New York: ACM Press

Rawls, John, 1973, A theory of Justice, London: Oxford University Press.

Reiter, R., 1980, “A logic for default reasoning”, dalam Artificial Intelligence 13:81- 132

Rissland, E. L., dan Ashley, K. D., 1987, “A Case-Based System for Trade Secrets Law” dalamProc. 1st Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 61-67, New York: ACM Press.

Ross, Mary Massaron, [2004] 2006, “A Basis for Legal Reasoning: Logic on Appeal, 46 No. 4 DRI For Def. 46 (2004). Dimuat lagi dalam Journal of the Assiciation of Legal Writing Directors,vol. 3, 2006, 177-189.

Scharffs, Brett G., 2004, “The Character of Legal Reasoning” dalamWash. & Lee L. Rev. 61, 733-786

Skalak, D. B., Rissland, E. L., 1991,“Argument moves in a rule-guided domain” dalam Proc. 3rd Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1-11, New York: ACM Press.

Soekadijo, R.G., 2003,cet.ke-9, Logika Dasar: tradisional, simbolik, dan induktif, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Stewart, David, & Blocker, H. Gene, 1996, Fundamentals of Philosophy, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Swisher, Peter Nash, 1981, “Teaching Legal Reasoning in Law School: The University of Richmond Experience”, paper presented to to the AALS Legal Writing, Reasoning and Research Section in SanAntonio, Texas, January 5, 1981. On line as 74 I. Lib. J. 534 (1981).

Toulmin, S., 1958,The Uses of Argument, Cambridge UK: Cambride University Press. Verheij, Bart, 2003, “Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic”, dalam Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11: 167-195.

Weinreb, Lloyd L., 2005, Legal Reason: The Use of Analogy in Legal Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.