Religious Gaslighting dalam Komunitas Muslim: Kritik Pendidikan Islam Terhadap Manipulasi Psikologis Manipulasi Psikologis Atas Nama Agama

Authors

  • Reina Aulia Revi Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
  • Misra Misra Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jmpai.v3i3.1126

Keywords:

Islamic Education, Psychological Manipulation, Religious Gaslighting

Abstract

Religious gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation that uses religious authority and teachings to question or doubt a person's perceptions, emotions, and experiences, so that the victim feels guilty or unfaithful. In the context of the Muslim community, this practice can occur when religious understanding is used narrowly and authoritarianly, suppressing freedom of thought, and perpetuating power imbalances—both in family relationships, communities, and religious institutions. This article examines the phenomenon of religious gaslighting from the perspective of critical Islamic education, with the aim of dismantling manipulative patterns wrapped in religious narratives. The approach used is qualitative-descriptive with literature analysis of classical and contemporary Islamic sources, as well as interdisciplinary studies in the fields of religious psychology and educational philosophy. The results of the study show that religious gaslighting is not only a matter of individual morals, but also part of an authoritarian social and cultural structure that needs to be countered through liberating (ta'dib) and transformative Islamic education. Islamic education based on the values ​​of justice (al-‘adl), compassion (rahmah), and deliberation can be a critical tool for building a healthy spiritual awareness and freeing people from the shackles of manipulative authority. Thus, education has a central role in forming a generation of Muslims who are able to distinguish between the authenticity of Islamic teachings and their misuse in the practice of power.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Munir, Z. (2020). Manipulasi Agama dan Perspektif Pendidikan Islam dalam Menghadapi Gaslighting Spiritual. Journal of Islamic Education and Ethics, 12(4), 95-112.

Alwani, Z. (2011). Islamic feminism: A critical examination of Islamic feminist thought. Journal of Islamic Thought, 14(1), 34-48.

Faris, M. (2018). Critical thinking and Islamic education: Building a progressive and inclusive curriculum. International Journal of Islamic Education, 7(3), 112-125.

Hassan, A. (2019). Religious authority and the politics of gender in Islam: Challenges and possibilities for the modern era. Journal of Gender and Religious Studies, 6(2), 75-89.

Keane, H. (2020). Manipulating faith: Religious gaslighting in contemporary communities. Journal of Contemporary Religious Studies, 34(1), 22-39.

Keshavarz, M., & Fitzpatrick, M. (2019). Religious Gaslighting: The Psychological and Social Impact of Spiritual Abuse in Muslim Communities. Journal of Psychology and Religion, 45(3), 234-251.

Nisa', M. (2015). The role of religious texts in gender inequality: A critical analysis. Journal of Islamic Studies and Feminism, 8(3), 112-127.

Nisa’, M. (2016). Gender justice in Islam: A critical study of Islamic teachings on women's rights and roles. Journal of Islamic Feminist Studies, 10(2), 56-69.

Sani, A. (2021). Islamic education and social justice: An analysis of liberating education concepts in contemporary Islamic thought. Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 4(1), 89-104.

Stines, L., & Campbell, M. (2019). The psychology of religious manipulation: Gaslighting in faith communities. Journal of Religion and Psychological Research, 12(2), 45-60.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-06

How to Cite

Reina Aulia Revi, & Misra Misra. (2025). Religious Gaslighting dalam Komunitas Muslim: Kritik Pendidikan Islam Terhadap Manipulasi Psikologis Manipulasi Psikologis Atas Nama Agama . Jurnal Manajemen Dan Pendidikan Agama Islam, 3(3), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.61132/jmpai.v3i3.1126

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.