Makna Simbolik Stupa di Depan Rumah Umat Buddha Vihara Mahanama: Kajian Antropologi dan Semiotika Arsitektur Buddhis

Susilo Susilo

doi:10.61132/jbpab.v2i2.1823

Authors

Susilo Susilo Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Negeri Raden Wijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jbpab.v2i2.1823

Keywords:

Architecture, Buddhist Community, Stupa, Symbolism, Vihara Mahanama

Abstract

This research aims to uncover the symbolic meaning of stupas placed in front of houses of Buddhist communities affiliated with Vihara Mahanama in Semanding Village, Central Java. Stupas as architectural and symbolic elements hold important positions in religious practice and cultural identity of local Buddhist communities. This study employs a qualitative approach using case study methods with ethnographic perspectives. Data collection techniques include field observations, in-depth interviews with Buddhist communities and vihara leaders, and visual documentation. Data were analyzed descriptively-interpretively using symbolic anthropology frameworks and semiotic architecture theory to reveal symbolic meanings contained in the form, placement, and social function of stupas in daily life. The results show that stupas are not merely religious ornaments, but represent multiple layers of meaning: spiritual values, cosmic symbolism, protection, and markers of Buddhist cultural identity in predominantly non-Buddhist environments. Stupa symbolism also reflects processes of cultural adaptation and spirituality rooted in the social dynamics of the Semanding Village community. This research contributes to understanding the integration of Buddhist symbols in contemporary Indonesian society and their role in maintaining religious identity in multicultural contexts, while also providing insights into the domestication of sacred symbols in everyday spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ammerman, N. T. (2007). Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305418.001.0001

Bechert, H., & Gombrich, R. (Eds.). (2013). The world of Buddhism: Buddhist monks and nuns in society and culture. Thames & Hudson.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday.

Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond identity. Theory and Society, 29(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007068714468

Casanova, J. (2006). Rethinking secularization: A global comparative perspective. The Hedgehog Review, 8(1–2), 7–22.

Coleman, S., & Eade, J. (Eds.). (2018). Reframing pilgrimage: Cultures in motion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315297989

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

DeCaroli, R. (2015). The Buddhist stupa as architectural mandala. Visual Resources, 31(1–2), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2015.1014525

Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1912)

Eck, D. L. (1998). Darsan: Seeing the divine image in India (3rd ed.). Columbia University Press.

Eco, U. (1980). Function and sign: The semiotics of architecture. In G. Broadbent, R. Bunt, & C. Jencks (Eds.), Signs, symbols, and architecture (pp. 11–69). John Wiley & Sons.

Eliade, M. (1961). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion. Harper & Row.

Foley, K. P. (2020). Architecture as symbol and self-identity. Design Studies, 67, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.12.004

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.

Harvey, P. (2013). An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history and practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800924

Kieschnick, J. (2003). The impact of Buddhism on Chinese material culture. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400825356

Orsi, R. A. (2005). Between heaven and earth: The religious worlds people make and the scholars who study them. Princeton University Press.

Snodgrass, A. (1985). The symbolism of the stupa. Cornell University Southeast Asia Program.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16

Trainor, K. (1997). Relics, ritual, and representation in Buddhism: Rematerializing the Sri Lankan Theravada tradition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520631

Turner, V. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Cornell University Press.

Tweed, T. A. (2006). Crossing and dwelling: A theory of religion. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674044517

Utari, D. S., Arifinsyah, & Ekowati, E. (2024). Analisis makna simbolik ornamen kuil Buddha dalam konteks keagamaan: Studi kasus Maha Vihara Maitreya. Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama, 7(3), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v7i3.2789

Wulansari, N. D. (2019). Makna simbolik dan relevansi tradisi napak tilas Raden Trenggono Kusumo dengan nilai-nilai Brahma Vihara. Jurnal Agama Buddha dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 5(2), 112–128.