Dari Tradisi Klasik ke Kontekstualisasi Modern

Tinjauan Literatur atas Dinamika Pertumbuhan Studi Al-Qur'an

Authors

  • Achmad Muzaqi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Aliya Zulva Ahsani Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Anggraini Citra Fatmala Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Mohamad Salik Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jbpai.v4i2.1935

Keywords:

Digital Qur'an, Islamic Epistemology, Living Qur'an, Qur'anic Studies, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

The discipline of Qur'anic Studies (‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān) has experienced a significant paradigm shift from the classical textual-normative approach to a modern contextual and hermeneutic framework. This systematic literature review aims to map the dynamics of this growth by evaluating the ontological, epistemological, and teleological boundaries of Qur'anic studies within contemporary Islamic scholarship. Utilizing a qualitative Systematic Literature Review (SLR) design, data were gathered from reputable academic journals published over the last decade and analyzed through thematic synthesis. The findings reveal four major transformations. First, an ontological redefinition where the Qur'an is no longer viewed merely as a static written text, but as a performative living discourse, necessitating a strict demarcation between the Qur'an and Hadith to prevent the sacralization of the profane. Second, an epistemological reconstruction that shifts the discipline from mechanistic auxiliary sciences to a holistic-interdisciplinary methodology integrating social sciences and humanities. Third, an expansion of scope beyond textual analysis into applied realities, notably the emergence of Living Qur'an and Digital Qur'an sub-disciplines responding to the disruption of religious authority. Fourth, a teleological shift where the ultimate goal of studying the Qur'an transitions from individual piety to social transformation, serving as an intellectual defense mechanism against post-truth populism and promoting emancipatory theology. The implication of this study suggests that contemporary Qur'anic studies must proactively offer ethical frameworks for global challenges rather than merely preserving historical dogma

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah, A. N., Nurrohim, A., Nugroho, K., Dahliana, Y., Nirwana, A., Transformasi, A. N., et al. (2025). AL-AFKAR: Journal for Islamic Studies, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v8i1.2022

Akbar, J., & Hakim, A. (2024). Poetic interpretation of the Qur’an: A critical study of Tafsir Al-Mubarok by Taufiqul Hakim. Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought, 2(2), 205–233. https://doi.org/10.15642/juit.2024.2.2.205-233

Anwar, A. (n.d.). Al-Qur’an dan modernitas (Pergeseran paradigma pemahaman Al-Qur’an).

Djidin, M. (2024). Qur’anic values as a foundation for social change in modern society. IQRO: Journal of Islamic Education, 7. Retrieved from IQRO Journal

Fata, Z., Hidayat, M. S., & Sahidin, A. (2023). Dialektika teks dan konteks dalam framework pemahaman hadis. AL QUDS: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis, 7(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v7i1.5002

Firda Rahmatun Nuzula. (n.d.). [Data publikasi tidak lengkap].

Huda Siregar, R. (2024). Nalar tafsir emansipatoris dalam Al-Qur’an Surat Al-Baqarah ayat 168. COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(12), 4995–5006. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i12.1299

Harahap, I. S., Akbar, A., Hermanto, E., & Hasibuan, M. M. (2025). Metode tafsir dalam perspektif Ulumul Qur’an: Pendekatan konseptual dalam pemahaman ayat-ayat Al-Qur’an. CARONG: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(2), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.62710/vfag5v93

Ja’far, M., Amanulloh, A., & Muzakky, M. I. (n.d.). Optimization of continuous improvement in Islamic education: A systematic literature review. https://doi.org/10.32478/evaluasi

Metodologi khusus penelitian ilmu Al-Qur’an & tafsir. (2025).

Muhammad Fatkhi, R., & Nugraha, E. (n.d.). Transformasi paradigma literatur Ulumul Quran dan Ulumul Hadis di Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v21i2.44577

Mustaqim, A. (2007). Epistemologi tafsir kontemporer: Studi komparatif antara Fazlur Rahman dan Muhammad Syahrur [Disertasi doktor, UIN Sunan Kalijaga].

Mustaqim, A. (2017). The epistemology of Javanese Qur’anic exegesis: A study of Ṣālih Darat’s Fayd al-Rahmān. Al-Jami’ah, 55(2), 357–390. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2017.552.357-390

Mustaqim, A. (2017). Penelitian Al-Qur’an dan tafsir.

Nurhidayati, S., Rosada, M., Lubis, M., & Sidik, A. (2025). Analisis epistemologis terhadap kriteria mufassir: Telaah atas sumber, metode dan validitas ilmu dalam perspektif Ushul al-Tafsir. Journal of Indonesian Tafsir Studies, 6.

Rohimin. (2017). Metodologi ilmu tafsir dan aplikasi model penafsiran. Pustaka Pelajar.

Rokim, S., Triana, R., & Al-Hidayah Bogor, S. (n.d.). Tafsir maudhui: Asas dan langkah penelitian tafsir tematik. Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir. https://doi.org/10.30868/at.v6i02.2057

Fauzi, S., Nasution, K. S., & Hanan, M. R. (2026). Periodisasi sikap orientalis Barat terhadap Islam: Analisis historis dan kritis. Komprehensif, 4. Retrieved from Komprehensif Journal

Shihab, M. Q. (2013). Kaidah tafsir: Syarat, ketentuan, dan aturan yang patut Anda ketahui dalam memahami ayat-ayat Al-Qur’an. Lentera Hati.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Nur Irwani, R., Khairi Putri, U., & Dewanti Palangkey, R. (n.d.). Genealogi ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an: The genealogy of the Qur’anic sciences: From oral tradition to a classical scholarly system. JICN: Jurnal Intelek dan Cendikiawan Nusantara. Retrieved from JICN Journal

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Achmad Muzaqi, Aliya Zulva Ahsani, Anggraini Citra Fatmala, & Mohamad Salik. (2026). Dari Tradisi Klasik ke Kontekstualisasi Modern: Tinjauan Literatur atas Dinamika Pertumbuhan Studi Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Budi Pekerti Agama Islam, 4(2), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.61132/jbpai.v4i2.1935

Similar Articles

<< < 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.